Massenbach-Letter: NEWS 08/11/13

Massenbach-Letter

Udo von Massenbach

Guten Morgen.

* Asia Times: China to reap harvest of NSA scandals*

Massenbach* Erst kommt die Macht, dann die Moral

Anlässlich des geschichtsträchtigen 9. November verfasste Michael Wolffsohn 13 Thesen zur "Vergangenheitsbewältigung". In einem Essay für die FAZ liefert der Historiker einen vielschichtigen Einblick mit überraschenden Ergebnissen.

http://www.wolffsohn.de/cms/images/Snippets_pdf/faz-gegenwart.pdf

„Machen wir uns nichts vor: Das Gedenken an die Verbrechen des Nationalsozialismus verkümmert meistens zum gedankenlosen, sinnentleerten Ritual.

Die immer gleichen Redner und immer gleichen Schreiber verbreiten die immer gleichen Worthülsen und Schlagworte „Gegen das Vergessen!“ oder „Nie wieder!“

Die Bürger lassen diese formalen Äußerlichkeiten über sich ergehen.

Innere Anteilnahme? Null. Ähnliches dürfte uns auch am und zum 9. November dieses Jahres erwarten.

Gedacht wird dabei der Reichskristallnacht, die vor genau 75 Jahren den Auftakt zum sechsmillionenfachen Judenmord bedeutete. Politisch korrekt wird die Reichskristallnacht (nur in Deutschland) seit 1988 Reichspogromnacht genannt. Das war dem geschichtspolitischen Schönheitswettbewerb zwischen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der DDR geschuldet. „Kristallnacht“ verharmlose, verkündete, befeuert von willfährigen universitären Dienstmägden, die DDR-Führung. Wer, wie in „der BRD“ üblich, von „Kristallnacht“ spreche, verschweige, dass in jener Terrornacht weit mehr als Glas zerstört worden sei. Bürger kamen in Konzentrationslager oder wurden ermordet, fast alle Synagogen gingen in Flammen auf. Um national und international nicht als das „schlechtere Deutschland“ zu gelten, übernahmen Amts- und Privat-Bundesrepublikaner, die sich für gute Deutsche

hielten, den Begriff „Reichspogromnacht“.

Diese deutsch-deutsche Komödie war und ist historisch völlig irreführend. Nach dem 9. November 1938 wollte die nationalsozialistische Propaganda dem In- und Ausland weismachen, der Volkszorn und nicht die zentralen NS- und Reichsführungen wären für die Verbrechen verantwortlich.

Doch kesse Berliner ließen sich nichts vor- oder weismachen. Um die Verantwortlichen eben nicht weißzuwaschen, nahmen sie als Vorsilbe „Reichs-“ und fügten „Kristall“ hinzu. Denn jedermann hatte in jener Nacht gesehen, dass weit mehr als Glas zu Bruch gegangen war. Reichskristallnacht bekundete zwar keinen Widerstand, wohl aber Widerwillen

gegen die er- und bekannten Verbrecher und Verbrechen. Keine Spur von Verharmlosung also.

Der 9. November 1938 hatte eine zweifache Vorgeschichte: zunächst den 9. November 1923, Hitlers Putschversuch in München. Dieser wäre undenkbar ohne die deutsche Revolution vom 9. November 1918, dem Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs und Anfang der ersten deutschen Demokratie, der Weimarer Republik. Seine Gegenrevolution plante Hitler am

fünften Jahrestag jener Revolution, und der 9. November 1938 sollte für die NS Regisseure die Rache für denselben Tag des Jahres 1918 und Gedenken an den 9. November 1923 sein.

Braun-deutsche Dunkelheiten symbolisieren diese Daten vom 9. November. Deutsche und europäische Helligkeit strahlt dagegen der 9. November 1989 aus, der Fall der Berliner Mauer, der Anfang vom Ende der rot-kommunistischen Ära weit über Deutschland hinaus. Dieser Helligkeit und Fröhlichkeit wird weniger gedacht als jener braunen Dunkelheit.

Aus Ängstlichkeit, Verkrampftheit, Feigheit, Selbstentfremdung? „Liebe deinen Nächsten wie dich selbst“ (Altes Testament, Leviticus 19,18; Neues Testament, Markus 12,29). „Wie dich selbst“. Wer sich selbst nicht liebt, nicht annimmt, der kann seine Nächsten nicht lieben, nicht annehmen. Das ist keine gute Grundlage für gute Gemeinschaft und Nachbarschaft, von Selbstachtung ganz zu schweigen.

Die Dialektik aus These und Antithese des Seins und der Geschichte beherrscht das denkende Deutschland in der Theorie besser als in der Praxis.

Anstatt wieder einmal jene geschichtlichen Um- oder Zustände und die dazugehörenden politisch korrekten Bekundungen rund um den 9. November abspulend

zu zitieren, sei versucht, das braune und rote Erbe Deutschlands in 13 Thesen zu bedenken. Da zudem das rote DDR Deutschland ohne das zurückliegende nationalsozialistisch-

braune historisch nicht möglich gewesen wäre, bietet sich ein Nachdenken über braun-rote Kontinuität und Wandel jenseits der rein reinen Datumsmagie von selbst an.

Fortsetzung.

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Policy= res publica

Freudenberg-Pilster* ‚Enormous‘ gender gap costs Cuccinelli, Republicans in Virginia

Democrat Terry McAuliffe appears on the cusp of a solid victory over Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli (R) following a gubernatorial campaign that underscored ongoing Republican struggles with female voters.

McAuliffe’s lead in the polls was built on a clear gender gap. The Democrat exploited a big fundraising edge to deluge the airwaves with ads focused on Cuccinelli’s opposition to abortion, his views on contraception and his failure to support the federal Violence Against Women Act.

Cuccinelli sought to refute the Democratic theme — that he has waged a “war on women” — with ads featuring an African American woman calling McAuliffe’s attacks on his social stances “ridiculous.”

The attorney general also released a video of his wife discussing Cuccinelli’s work to prevent sexual assault and rolled out a robust “truth about Ken” section on his website refuting McAuliffe’s attacks.But the effort never gained traction with independent voters and Cuccinelli finished his campaign as he began it, with a focus on turning out base conservatives rather than winning over centrists.

“The McAuliffe campaign did a really good job of defining (Cuccinelli) early — but frankly, he did a pretty good job with his record of defining himself,” says Democratic pollster Celinda Lake. “The gender gap is just enormous.”

In a Quinnipiac University poll released Monday, Cuccinelli trailed by six points. That split was entirely driven by female voters, who broke by a 14-point margin for McAuliffe.

Cuccinelli actually led with male voters in the poll.

“Cuccinelli couldn’t get out of his own way and got slimed with the war on women attack,” says GOP strategist Ford O’Connell. “He never got outside the conservative echo chamber.”

The attorney general isn’t the first Republican to fall victim to Democrats’ “war on women” attack.

Mitt Romney was hurt by the same argument, as were a number of Senate candidates in 2012.

While New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) has avoided the same fate — and is poised for a decisive reelection in blue-state New Jersey on Tuesday — other Republicans continue to struggle to overcome attacks over social issues.

Vice President Biden appeared with McAuliffe on Monday to accuse Cuccinelli of having views on women that are “literally from another era.”

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/governor-races/189220-enormous-gender-gap-costs-cuccinelli-gop-in-virginia

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Politics: From Vision to Action

Barandat* Central Asia After 2014

Brief Synopsis

View the Executive Summary

As NATO and the United States proceed to withdraw their forces from Afghanistan, the inherent and preexisting geopolitical, security, and strategic challenges in Central Asia become ever more apparent. The rivalry among the great powers: the United States, China, Russia, India, and others to a lesser degree, are all becoming increasingly more visible as a key factor that will shape this region after the allied withdrawal from Afghanistan. The papers collected here, presented at SSI’s annual conference on Russia in 2012, go far to explaining what the agenda for that rivalry is and how it is likely to influence regional trends after 2013. Therefore, these papers provide a vital set of insights into an increasingly critical area of international politics and security, especially as it is clear that the United States is reducing, but not totally withdrawing, its military establishment in Afghanistan and is seeking to consolidate long-term relationships with Central Asian states. Accordingly, these papers provide assessments of Sino-Russian rivalry, the U.S.-Russian rivalry, and a neglected but critical topic—Chinese military capability for action in Central Asia. All of these issues are essential for any informed analysis of the future of Central Asian security, as well as relations among the great powers in Central Asia.

http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubID=1175&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+StrategicStudiesInstitute+%28Strategic+Studies+Institute+U.S.+Army+War+College%29

*************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

*************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Suter* Persuading mothers to work: results from an experiment

by IZA Press

Many women see themselves as the better providers of care for their children, and thus refrain from delegating child care. At the same time, they may be skeptical about their chances of being successful both as mothers and in their working career. On explanation for such a view could be lacking information on the employment could have a positive effect on female labor force participation.

A new IZA discussion papers tests this hypothesis: Vincenzo Galasso, Paola Profeta, Chiara D. Pronzato and Francesco C. Billari have designed a randomized survey experiment, in which 1500 Italian women aged 20 to 40 are exposed to information on the positive consequences of formal child care on children future educational attainments. Surprisingly at first sight, the authors find that women reduce their intended labor supply on average. However, there are substantial differences by educational attainment in the response: highly educated women respond to better information by increasing their intended use of formal child care. In contrast, low educated women do not modify their formal child care decision and reduce their intended labor supply. The authors explain these heterogeneous responses with different monetary incentives and different preferences for maternal care between high and low educated women.

For policymakers, these mixed findings send a warning signal about the true effectiveness of often advocated public policies regarding formal child care. The authors conclude that public policies should acknowledge that child care decisions by mothers may depend on budgetary restrictions — as in the case of low wage mothers — but also on maternal identity. Thus, some (low educated) mothers may in fact choose to stay at home and take care of the children, even when family friendly institutions are available.

Read abstract or download discussion paper [pdf].

IZA Press | November 4, 2013 at 10:15 am | URL: http://wp.me/p3cqoR-rF

***************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Middle East

Turkey and Iran sign secret intelligence cooperation pact. Ankara rolls up anti-Iran spy rings

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report November 3, 2013, 8:12 AM (IDT)

Turkish and Iranian Foreign Ministers Ahmet Davutoglu and Javad Zarif secretly signed in Ankara a pact covering intelligence cooperation between their two countries, Friday, Nov. 1, DEBKAfile’s excusive sources report.

Although a member of NATO, Turkey undertook under this accord to stop cooperating with any third countries in spying on Iran and to roll up anti-Iranian spy rings operating from its soil. Most significantly, the Erdogan government agreed to end the activities of agents collecting information on Iran from the Turkish side of the Iranian border.
The details of the new pact were worked out in six weeks of discussions between Hakan Fidan, head of the Turkish MIT intelligence service and Khosrow Hosseinian, Iran’s deputy intelligence minister in charge of special duties.
Our Iranian sources add that this Iranian official operates under such deep cover that he uses a false name and few people even in Tehran know his real identity.

Sitting in too on some of their sessions was acting Iranian Revolutionary Guards chief and head of its intelligence, Brig. Gen. Hossein Salami.

The new pact presents a major obstacle to any further credible intelligence-gathering on Iran from Turkey.

Our sources disclose that the MIT showed Tehran its good will by jumping the gun on the pact in the third week of October and forcing the many agents based on the Turkish border with Iran to pack their bags and quit. Their main task, with or without the knowledge of Ankara, was to quiz fleeing Iranians who were heading via Turkey for Europe or the United States.

That Turkey and Iran were in the process of setting up an intelligence partnership came to the Obama administration’s knowledge last month. It is believed to have prompted The Washington Post disclosure of Oct. 17 that Turkey had blown the cover of an Iranian spy ring working for Israel.

According to that report, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and Fidan last year shopped 10 Iranian agents serving the Israeli Mossad and US intelligence, who had been using the ease of crossing the border without requiring passports to meet their handlers in Turkey.

Turkey’s betrayal of that network opened the door to negotiations with Iran on the new pact.

Our intelligence sources also report that the day it was signed, Victoria Nuland, assistant secretary of state for European and Asian Affairs and former US State Department spokesperson, was on a visit to Ankara. It is not clear if she was in on the pact.
Having just signed it, the Turkish foreign minister reacted with extreme anger Saturday to Lebanes press claims that Ankara had provided intelligence for the Israeli Air Force strike on a Russian anti-air missile consignment in the Syrian coastal town of Latakia Wednesday Oct.30, to prevent its delivery to Hizballah. Clearly uncomfortable, Davutoglu burst out: “There is an attempt to give the impression that Turkey has coordinated with Israel. We have issues with Syria based on a principle. But let me say it clearly: The Turkish government has never cooperated with Israel against any Muslim country, and it never will,” he told reporters. “Despite differences on Syria, we have deep and historic relations with Iran,” he added.

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Massenbach’s Recommendation

Four Oil, Gas Recruiting Trends Plague US Industry

Rigzone Staff 11/1/2013

URL: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/129918/Four_Oil_Gas_Recruiting_Trends_Plague_US_Industry

It is estimated that the United States will be the world’s top producer of petroleum and natural gas hydrocarbons in 2013, surpassing Russia and Saudi Arabia, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Thus, increasing the nation’s energy workforce, which has witnessed a 41 percent increase since the end of the recession through July 2013, reported the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Increased energy demand means increased manpower. For this year and next, there are four recruiting trends that will continue to plague the industry, and these trends might affect corporation bottom lines and the energy market.

Employers face a challenging market in which costs are rising and new resources are emerging.

"These four trends are global with talent being shifted throughout the world to fulfill the demand and support of these operations," remarked Adam Berk, Principal, Human Capital, Performance & Reward at Ernst &Young to Rigzone. (Graphics)

http://www.rigzone.com/news/article_pf.asp?a_id=129918

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

US Shale Boom Will Boost LPG Exports and Bring Down Prices
Henning Gloystein 11/4/2013
URL: http://www.rigzone.com/news/oil_gas/a/129935/US_Shale_Boom_Will_Boost_LPG_Exports_and_Bring_Down_Prices

LONDON, Nov 4 (Reuters) – A U.S. energy drilling boom is revolutionizing the niche market for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), bringing down global prices and challenging established exporters in the Middle East.

The changes are the latest sign of the global impact of a drilling renaissance in the United States that has already hit oil and natural gas. And like oil and gas, it is U.S. producers of LPG who are set to gain most while established exporters may struggle with new competition in a suddenly altered landscape.

Unconventional oil and gas drilling, including shale gas extraction from fracking, is controversial because it requires large amounts of water and chemicals to be pumped at high pressure into the earth, and some countries such as France and Bulgaria have banned the technology.

In the United States, however, shale oil and gas has resulted in a sharp increase in production, turning the country from a large energy importer into an oil and gas exporter.

In the LPG market, which is mostly known for use of butane and propane in household devices but increasingly also in transport, analysts say that North America will vie with the Middle East as the world’s top LPG supply region this year and in 2014 at average daily production rates of around two million barrels per day (b/d).

U.S. shipments are expected to bring down global LPG prices as top Middle Eastern suppliers like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have to adjust to their new low-priced competitors.

"The stars are aligned for increased U.S. LPG exports to Asia," U.S. energy researchers ESAI Energy said in a research note in October.

"Of the anticipated U.S. LPG surplus of nearly 350,000 b/d by 2015, about 110,000 b/d could reach Asian markets. This game-changing development will redraw global LPG trade flows and force Middle Eastern LPG exporters to lower prices," ESAI Energy said, adding that Saudi contract prices would fall from over $70 a barrel now to $68 per barrel in 2014 and to $65 in 2015.

Although U.S. propane production from shale gas has been rising for a while, a lack of export infrastructure has kept most of the output at home, pulling U.S. prices well below international levels, but high global prices have attracted investment and U.S. export capacity is now rising fast.

Following Texas-based Enterprise Products, which anounced early in October that it would build a 6 million barrel a month LPG export terminal, its local peer Phillips 66 also said last week that it would develop a $1 billion LPG export terminal at Freeport, Texas, with a capacity of 4.4 million barrels per month.

"We are looking at a rapidly changing energy landscape that presents excellent opportunities," said Tim Taylor, executive vice president at Phillips 66.

"There are attractive markets outside of the United States for products like butane and propane," he added.

U.S. LPG exports averaged around 148,000 b/d in 2011 and rose to 196,000 b/d last year, while exports were already up to an average of 280,000 b/d in the first seven months of 2013.

With the U.S. having too much LPG to use itself, its traditional supplier Canada is also eyeing an export terminal to serve Asia, adding to future downward price pressure and further undermining the Middle East’s market dominance in this sector.

Europe & Asia Compete for Imports

Analysts say that the U.S. LPG export boom will be further aided by the expansion of the Panama Canal, allowing the passage of so-called very large gas carriers (VLGC) to pass through it from 2015 and reducing the cost of freight by cutting the sailing time from the U.S. to Asia by over two weeks.

"A good fundamental outlook (for) the next three years mainly due to more U.S. exports has led to more interest in (VLGC) tonnage," Norwegian brokerage Pareto Securities said in a research note in October.

Although the main focus of U.S. LPG exports will be Asia, some analysts say that the lower freight rates U.S. exporters need to pay to ship LPG to Europe will mean that Europe and Asia will begin to compete for American supplies.

"The high cost of freight to Asian destinations means that the European arbitrage route is more attractive from a logistical point of view and this lends support to our view that U.S. LPG volumes will largely remain within the Atlantic Basin over the coming years," researchers at JBC Energy said in a market report.

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

*******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

* Asia Times: China to reap harvest of NSA scandals *

The best warfare strategy is to attack the enemy’s plans, next is to attack alliances.Sun Tzu, The Art of War

A growing chorus of nations is decrying Washington’s unrestrained cyber espionage. However, there is only one country with both the means and motivation for using mounting international resentment to challenge American hegemony. The NSA surveillance of America’s allies has opened up two vital fronts in which China can erode American global dominance.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying has claimed the rhetorical high ground, calling cyber security "a matter of sovereignty". She said Beijing is eager to address the issue through the framework of the United Nations, and to do so "China and Russia have submitted a draft plan, in an effort to help the world jointly tackle the problem." [1]

This joint Sino-Russian proposal to combat the NSA’s electronic surveillance coincides with a parallel initiative launched by two allies of the United States.

Germany and Brazil are working together to create a UN resolution aimed at curtailing electronic spying. Both nations have been openly angry with Washington in the wake of revelations that the NSA has for years spied on the personal communications of both Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and German Chancellor Merkel.

Brazilian and German diplomats expect to finish the draft within a week, and then send the resolution to the UN Human Rights Committee. According to political scientist Gunther Maihold, "Brazil’s main interest is that this should result in international regulation by the UN." [2]

Such international regulation of electronic espionage would be anathema to large portions of the American political class, who believe unlimited NSA spying is justified by the perpetual threat of "terrorism", and are distrustful of the United Nations.

Beijing may be supporting anti-cyber espionage efforts at the United Nations precisely because China’s leaders expect such efforts will fail in the face of American political intransigence. The fallout from Washington blocking anti-surveillance initiatives at the United Nations could disrupt American diplomacy for decades to come.

Chinese backing of UN efforts to curb the NSA’s activities may undermine American hegemony by disrupting America’s alliances. These alliances have cemented Washington’s global dominance for the greater part of a century.

Nevertheless, Beijing’s opposition to American cyber espionage is to a large degree a defensive tactic.

According to Der Spiegel, the NSA runs listening posts in Beijing, Shanghai, Chengdu, Hong Kong, and Taipei.

Furthermore, this week Japanese media reported that in 2011 the NSA sought Tokyo’s help to wiretap fiber-optic cables running through Japan. [3] This move was almost certainly aimed primary at gathering important political and economic data from China – terrorists of East Asian ancestry are not generally regarded as a major threat to the American homeland.

The Japanese government declined the proposal because intercepting communications on such a large scale would be illegal under Japanese law.

This story encapsulates some of the absurdities of the current situation. China, long accused by Washington of cooperation with lawless "rogue states", has been protected from American surveillance by the laws of Japan.

Morality matters
The second front in which Beijing can make advances against Washington is in the sphere of international public opinion. American leaders have long espoused an image of America as a uniquely ethical nation, a "city upon a hill", an ideal moral power which lesser, more barbaric and grossly self-interested countries should emulate.

The practice of secretly monitoring tens of millions of phone calls of one’s allies – including the communications of some of America’s closest friends – has severely tarnished this image. China’s official media is now capitalizing on this development. On Wednesday, the top story on the China Daily website was entitled "Spy scandal ‚will weaken‘ US global credibility".

Chinese-language media was even more vociferous. State-run CCTV Four featured Zhang Zhaozhong, a well-known military commentator, as saying: "Now the United States, if they wish to return to democratic freedom and human rights, should apologize to the entire world, saying: I am sorry, we designed some software like this, we have this type of back door, in the future we will manage it seriously…" [4]

How times have changed. Only a few months ago, the US government was increasingly vocal in criticizing Chinese cyber espionage. Before President Barack Obama went to his first summit with President Xi Jinping, a White House official called on China to abide by international "rules of the road", and told reporters that "Governments are responsible for cyber attacks that take place from within their borders". [5]

China is eager to remind domestic and international audiences of official American hypocrisy, now that such hypocrisy has been exposed on a global scale.

Morality – or rather, the perception of morality – plays a significant role in America’s foreign policy objectives. The United States, for all its flaws, has garnered admirers and supporters all around the world for the open, democratic ideals it disseminates.

In contrast, Chinese foreign policy has had little relation to ideology for the past several decades. Beijing cements its relationships with foreign countries around mutual self-interest, usually of the economic kind.

Beijing stands to benefit from emphasizing America’s self-induced loss of moral standing. In the wake of Guantanamo Bay and the Iraq war, Washington cannot afford a further loss of integrity. If the United States is increasingly perceived to an amoral and hypocritical power, then Chinese policies of practical economic benefits and political non-interference may be increasingly attractive.

It is worth pointing out that China is Brazil’s largest trading partner, and bilateral trade between China and Germany is more valuable than trade between Germany and the US.

As revelations of NSA electronic surveillance continue to mount, expect Beijing to continue highlighting Washington’s moral duplicity. China will also support initiatives at the UN to curtail cyber espionage, potentially deepening divides between America and its allies. However, the damage is largely self-wrought. The rocks that were once thrown at China have come back to shatter the glass-house of American integrity.

Notes:
1. "Spy scandal ‚will weaken‘ US global credibility", China Daily, October 30, 2013.
2. "Germany and Brazil want UN vote on NSA spying", Deutsche Welle, October 31, 2013.
3. "NSA asked Japan to tap regionwide fiber-optic cables in 2011", The Japan Times, October 27, 2013.
4. "Zhang Zhaozhong speaks of the Snowden affair’s frightening secret", People’s Daily, October 30, 2013 (Chinese).
5. "Obama to press China’s Xi to act against cyber spying", Reuters, June 4, 2013.

Brendan P O’Reillyis a China-based writer and educator from Seattle.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/CHIN-01-311013.html

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Council of Foreign Relations: Analysis

"Even after West Germany’s economic recovery and its rise to NATO membership, the United States and Britain excluded it from the ‚SIGINT‘ inner circle. The potential benefits of including the Bonn government were outweighed by the risks of Soviet and East German infiltration. West German governments gave the NSA access to U.S.-occupied German territory, anyway," Charles Lane writes in the Washington Post.

"The US clearly wants to maintain a strong counter-terrorism capability. But protecting the role and reputation of US communications companies—and their place in a seamless worldwide web—is a crucial economic goal. As the controversy over the NSA continues, the risk that the US faces is that the unfettered power of the agency will ultimately damage America’s internet companies—the symbol of US technology leadership," the Financial Timeswrites in an editorial.

"It has been a full year since federal agents snooped through the private emails of my husband and me, setting in motion a series of events that ultimately led to the resignations of Central Intelligence Agency Director David Petraeus and Gen. John Allen, the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan. The anniversary is a somber reminder of the unintended consequences and harsh realities that can result from unrestrained government probing into Americans‘ personal communications," Jill Kelley writes in the Wall Street Journal.

http://links.cfr.mkt5175.com/servlet/MailView?ms=NDQyOTMyMDMS1&r=NTIzMzIzOTk0NjES1&j=MjExNjgwNTE5S0&mt=1&rt=0

********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

see our letter on:

Wir wünschen Ihnen ein angenehmes Wochenende. Ihr Team.

*****************************************************************************************************************
Udo von Massenbach – Bärbel Freudenberg-Pilster – Jörg Barandat – Edith Suter

UdovonMassenbachMail

Edith.SuterJoergBarandat

pub1175-Central Asia After 2014.pdf

RIGZONE – Four Oil, Gas Recruiting Trends Plague US Industry.pdf

faz-gegenwart-Wolffsohn-zum 9. November-Erst kommt die macht, dann Moral.pdf

Advertisements